Jump to content

User talk:pburka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi Pburka

I've just seen that you removed the Slavery template from the article on Bell. I'd be grateful if you could explain to me why you think it's inappropriate for this article.

Many thanks

Gillaween (talk) 16:54, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two reasons. First, the template appeared to have been copied into the page, possibly using the subst keyword. Most templates shouldn't be copied. Second, that template is meant for more general topics related to slavery. It's not included in most articles about individuals who were enslaved. pburka (talk) 17:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for responding. My apologies for adding the template incorrectly. It is used on the page on the Joseph Knight case, which also relates to slavery case law in Scotland so I thought it was appropriate.
Gillaween (talk) 15:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's always a judgment call. I would guess that someone thought it was appropriate on that page because of the significant emphasis on Knight v. Wedderburn, which appears to have been an influential case regarding slavery. Feel free to put it back if you think it makes sense, but please don't subst it. pburka (talk) 16:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]